@UKTechHub
.
.

Reply To: DSL-AC88U very poor annex m upload performance First, sorry for my english, i´m from spain. I moved to DSL-AC52U to DSL-AC88U and the result has been disastrous. With the AC52U I have a 2.5 upload sync… and now…

› UKTH forums › 🛜 Wireless Routers & Modems › ASUS & Wireless › DSL-AC88U very poor annex m upload performance First, sorry for my english, i´m from spain. I moved to DSL-AC52U to DSL-AC88U and the result has been disastrous. With the AC52U I have a 2.5 upload sync… and now... › Reply To: DSL-AC88U very poor annex m upload performance First, sorry for my english, i´m from spain. I moved to DSL-AC52U to DSL-AC88U and the result has been disastrous. With the AC52U I have a 2.5 upload sync… and now…

#977
UK SentinelUK Sentinel
Keymaster
  • Replies 8,726
  • The Skipper

[quote quote=975]The router of my ISP is the Comtrend AR 5307U, for me is more important the upload than download I prefer 2.5mb of upload and 10mb of download than 25 MB of download and 2 of upload. Thanks.[/quote]

The Comtrend AR5307U also  has a MediaTeK chipset, so looks like in your part of the world, for highest upload synch speed (Annex M) , MediaTeK chipset suits your needs best.

I personnaly use Lantiq based DSL chipset, but they, like Broadcom, will not synch as at a higher rate compared to MediaTeK, but are very stable.

Looks like DSL-AC56 is a wise upgrade, for you

 

Latest Posts