Reply To: ASUS New DSL-AX82U Modem Router Combo – Wifi 6

[yakumo]

Yes, I saw that, but nothing in the actual SIN 498 MCT document provided by Openreach appears to actually back up that particular quote including the definition of a “SIN” document itself (Suppliers’ Information Note) unless you are a  Communications Provider (AKA. Supplier), which makes it seem like there has been some miscommunication within some manufacturers, or they’re running ahead on information which does not actually seem to have been documented yet while pointing to what would then be out of date documentation as the source (a very strange source considering it’s title classification).

Without being able to find a statement or document from BT/Openreach themselves declaring this status change overruling the content of SIN498 itself, it honestly looks like an internal company memo has gone around (in 2016) warning of document compliance becoming a requirement while accidentally omitting exactly who that requirement pertains to, and then it’s fallen into a helpful advertising bullet point which is still fairly factual, but not quite entirely genuine for end users if the SIN 948 MCT is taken as-written by itself.

*other than the simple generic single instance of  ‘if your equipment disrupts our service then it will be blocked’ which would normally be assumed as obvious anyway.

“I have decided you must work for ASUS”  no but if they would happen to offer consultant fees I’d be happy for them to get in touch, hard times after all ;-)

Share the knowledge

You need to login in order to vote