ASUS ZenWiFi AX Whole Home Tri-Band Mesh WiFi 6 System Not sure if this is the right place to ask…. I am thinking of upgrading my Google Mesh wifi to the above. Has anyone used this and does it...

[dodgydrains]

UK Sentinel wrote:

dodgydrains wrote:

Feedback sent. Reverted back to the offline beta 388.21099 you shared with me. I will be WFH next week and will need a stable connection.

So ASUS have comeback after looking at your feedback log and have confirmed that with FW9.0.0.4_FW21493 you did have a wifi connection problem, but they cannot see any indication as to why in the logs etc. ASUS ask if you had the same issue with FW9.0.0.4_FW21101 beta firmware?

I do not recall having this problem with beta 21101.  I can confirm that I did not have the problem with the offline beta 21099 you shared.

You need to login in order to vote

[UK Sentinel]

dodgydrains wrote:

I do not recall having this problem with beta 21101.  I can confirm that I did not have the problem with the offline beta 21099 you shared.

Thanks, I will let ASUS know

In a completely sane world, madness is the only freedom (J.G.Ballard).

You need to login in order to vote

[robgbc]

Hi All,

Newly arrived from SNB.

9.0.0.4.388_21493 is stable for me after 48 hours, although the router did crash and automatically recover Saturday afternoon.

19 devices connected with a mix of Windows computers, Android & IOS phones and IoT. Free ram is currently 185MB and tends to hover around 60-65% utilization.

No issue with wireless backhaul, 50hr up-time, setup as AX only, WPA3, 80 Mhz connection

Cheers,

Rob

You need to login in order to vote

[UK Sentinel]

robgbc wrote:

Newly arrived from SNB. 9.0.0.4.388_21493 is stable for me after 48 hours, although the router did crash and automatically recover Saturday afternoon.

Welcome and thank you for the feedback, it is interesting that XT8 beta firmware RT-AX95Q_9.0.0.4_388_21493-g12b5b2a_puresqubi.w has been downloaded 27 times (at least) and only a couple of issues reported.

Keep is updated if you could

In a completely sane world, madness is the only freedom (J.G.Ballard).

You need to login in order to vote

[TomThumb]

On beta fw 9.0.0.4.388_21493

I’m still having the same issue with the router gui locking up after trying to access it’s web history,

with an uptime of circa 36Hrs (1 to 2 days I normally see errors) but this time free ram is just over 100MB, definitely an improvement in ‘reported’ memory with 21493 fw

still seems to be a max data entry limit causing errors for me.

 

I had recently opened a ticket with Asus Re: my web history, but put that on hold while I took the recent beta’s for a test drive,

so for me, I’m gonna rollback to a clean install of the general release 3.0.0.4.388.21099 fw, before I continue with my open ticket with Asus.

 

Tom…

Router gui logs from lockup, HTTPD again!

Nov 8 12:46:21 wlceventd: wlceventd_proc_event(511): wl2.4: Disassoc 92:00:22:4E:04:B4, status: 0, reason: Disassociated because sending station is leaving (or has left) BSS (8), rssi:0
Nov 8 12:49:13 HTTPD: waitting 10 minitues and restart
Nov 8 12:49:13 rc_service: httpd 1585:notify_rc restart_httpd
Nov 8 12:49:13 ZenWiFi_XT8: start httpd:80
Nov 8 12:49:13 httpd: Save SSL certificate…80
Nov 8 12:49:13 httpd: mssl_cert_key_match : PASS
Nov 8 12:49:13 httpd: Succeed to init SSL certificate…80
Nov 8 12:49:34 acsd: eth4: selected_chspec is 1008 (8)
Nov 8 12:49:34 acsd: eth4: Adjusted channel spec: 0x1008 (8)

Liked by:

You need to login in order to vote

[UK Sentinel]

Interesting regarding ‘HTTPD: waiting ‘ are any USB drives in use ?

In a completely sane world, madness is the only freedom (J.G.Ballard).

You need to login in order to vote

[TomThumb]

UK Sentinel wrote:

Interesting regarding ‘HTTPD: waiting ‘ are any USB drives in use ?

 

No usb connected, never had the need,

With the general release fw, web history seems populate correctly, then no new data entries after 1 or 2 day’s of uptime, but trying to access web history on the beta’s lock the gui up inside a similar timeframe.

TM systems don’t seem to be 100% in the recent beta’s for me, but don’t know if that’s by design or omission.

 

Tom…

You need to login in order to vote

[UK Sentinel]

Understood, before you roll back, can you send a feedback and mention in comments box ‘UK Sentinel’ and describe issue, at least they will have a point of reference .

In a completely sane world, madness is the only freedom (J.G.Ballard).

You need to login in order to vote

[dodgydrains]

TomThumb wrote:

UK Sentinel wrote:

Interesting regarding ‘HTTPD: waiting ‘ are any USB drives in use ?

No usb connected, never had the need, With the general release fw, web history seems populate correctly, then no new data entries after 1 or 2 day’s of uptime, but trying to access web history on the beta’s lock the gui up inside a similar timeframe. TM systems don’t seem to be 100% in the recent beta’s for me, but don’t know if that’s by design or omission. Tom…

Might be worth testing the offline 21099 beta that UK Sentinel shared with me?

You need to login in order to vote

[TomThumb]

UK Sentinel wrote:

Understood, before you roll back, can you send a feedback and mention in comments box ‘UK Sentinel’ and describe issue, at least they will have a point of reference .

<noscript></noscript>

Will do, I did fire the same few lines of the log back to Asus support against my open ticket, marked up for info only & outlined the issue along with the beta version.

Then I would open full communication once back on the general stable release 21099.

 

Tom…

dodgydrains wrote:

TomThumb wrote:

UK Sentinel wrote:

Interesting regarding ‘HTTPD: waiting ‘ are any USB drives in use ?

No usb connected, never had the need, With the general release fw, web history seems populate correctly, then no new data entries after 1 or 2 day’s of uptime, but trying to access web history on the beta’s lock the gui up inside a similar timeframe. TM systems don’t seem to be 100% in the recent beta’s for me, but don’t know if that’s by design or omission. Tom…

Might be worth testing the offline 21099 beta that UK Sentinel shared with me?

 

Can you confirm the fw dodgy, as 3.0.0.4.388.21099 is the last stable general release!

 

Tom…

You need to login in order to vote

[UK Sentinel]

I would not worry about the 21099 offline beta, will cause more confusion 😉

In a completely sane world, madness is the only freedom (J.G.Ballard).

You need to login in order to vote

[TomThumb]

UK Sentinel wrote:

I would not worry about the 21099 offline beta, will cause more confusion

No worries & feedback sent,

altho with my typing skills being slower than slow, the 30 min auto logout did cause me to start afresh after it kicked me out,

While working twice as hard negates the real reason of having to provide feedback twice🙈

the former always sounds better 🤭

 

Tom…

Liked by:

You need to login in order to vote

[robgbc]

robgbc wrote:

Hi All, Newly arrived from SNB. 9.0.0.4.388_21493 is stable for me after 48 hours, although the router did crash and automatically recover Saturday afternoon. 19 devices connected with a mix of Windows computers, Android & IOS phones and IoT. Free ram is currently 185MB and tends to hover around 60-65% utilization. No issue with wireless backhaul, 50hr up-time, setup as AX only, WPA3, 80 Mhz connection Cheers, Rob

Now at 94+ hours up-time, 175MB free ram, and all good with wireless backhaul.

Wireless WAN to LAN speedtest off the node on a 1000x100mbps connection is around 800×100

 

 

Attachments:

1. 

   2022-11-09_164325.jpg
   

Liked by:

You need to login in order to vote

[UK Sentinel]

robgbc wrote:

Now at 94+ hours up-time, 175MB free ram, and all good with wireless backhaul.

In a completely sane world, madness is the only freedom (J.G.Ballard).

You need to login in order to vote

[Nicky]

That sounds promising. Are you getting any 2.4 GHz disconnect issues?

You need to login in order to vote

[Author]

Posts