› UKTH forums › 🛜 Wireless Routers & Modems › ASUS & Wireless › ASUS – DSL-AC88U / DSL-AC3100 Firmwares (beta's) etc. Looks like a new Beta Release for the DSL-AC88U is available, this version has Telnet enabled and improved 2.4GHz wifi (I believe). DSL-AC88U_v9.10.06_build581_debug.w.zip https://www.asuswebstorage.com/navigate/s/604D61534F2541D1B3CE1CC031A697E4Y UK Sentinel In a completely...
- This topic has 1,438 replies, 106 voices, and was last updated 1 week, 6 days ago by
alt.james.
- AuthorPosts
- September 28, 2018 at 9:09 pm #884September 28, 2018 at 9:36 pm #886
– Revert to build 540
– WiFi 2.4GHz, 5GHz, Guest (no MAC Filter)
– DDNS
– DHCP da 192.168.1.50 a 192.168.1.199
– Port Forwarding (10 rules)
– AI Protection off (default)
– Firewall ON (after a switch to off and after a restore to on, otherwise I was not able to navigate on some sites, for example the Italian forum related the router).Date Time Used % Free ---------------------------------- 2018-09-28 22:30 168MB (37%) 289MB 2018-09-29 07:20 170MB (37%) 288MB 2018-09-29 12:05 171MB (37%) 287MB 2018-09-29 15:30 171MB (37%) 287MB 2018-09-29 18:00 171MB (37%) 287MB 2018-09-29 20:30 171MB (37%) 287MB 2018-09-29 22:40 171MB (37%) 287MB 2018-09-30 09:00 171MB (37%) 286MB 2018-09-30 12:00 172MB (38%) 285MB 2018-09-30 14:00 173MB (38%) 284MB 2018-09-30 18:30 173MB (38%) 284MB 2018-09-30 21:30 173MB (38%) 284MB
You need to login in order to vote
September 28, 2018 at 9:40 pm #890– Revert to build 540 – WiFi 2.4GHz, 5GHz, Guest (no MAC Filter) – DDNS – DHCP da 192.168.1.50 a 192.168.1.199 – Port Forwarding (10 rules) – AI Protection off (not changed the default) – Firewall OFF (otherwise I’m not able to navigate on some sites, for example the Italian forum related the router). This is the same problem seen on the build 527
Date Time Used % Free ---------------------------------- 2018-09-28 22:30 168MB (37%) 289MB
Same Memory Start usage as firmware 546 at least they are they same at the start.
In a completely sane world, madness is the only freedom (J.G.Ballard).
You need to login in order to vote
September 28, 2018 at 9:47 pm #897Not completely true. In the 540, at the start, I have seen more memory allocation, but after 20 seconds (+/-) the memory came back to the ‘normal’ initial value.
PS: The Firewall is ON, after the Switch OFF and came back, now seems works correctly (I’m able to navigate also in the Italian forum), except that the ports are closed instead stealth (but I think this is a know problem of this version).
You need to login in order to vote
September 29, 2018 at 8:02 am #902Not completely true. In the 540, at the start, I have seen more memory allocation, but after 20 seconds (+/-) the memory came back to the ‘normal’ initial value. PS: The Firewall is ON, after the Switch OFF and came back, now seems works correctly (I’m able to navigate also in the Italian forum), except that the ports are closed instead stealth (but I think this is a know problem of this version).
Yes, I also believe the release 540 had FW issues, memory usage so far from you above chart/table has only used 2Mb extra after 9 hours, your 546 chart, showed 20Mb extra used after 9 ish hours ???
Interesting ;)
In a completely sane world, madness is the only freedom (J.G.Ballard).
You need to login in order to vote
September 29, 2018 at 11:09 am #905Yes, I confirm that the 540 has a better memory management. After 14 hours there is only 3MB more than the starting value. The configuration is exactly the same of the test done with the build 546. Probably this is the better starting point for a new firmware without the memory leak.
You need to login in order to vote
September 29, 2018 at 2:35 pm #907Yes, I confirm that the 540 has a better memory management. After 14 hours there is only 3MB more than the starting value. The configuration is exactly the same of the test done with the build 546. Probably this is the better starting point for a new firmware without the memory leak.
Good news so far ;)
In a completely sane world, madness is the only freedom (J.G.Ballard).
You need to login in order to vote
September 29, 2018 at 5:04 pm #909Today the memory seems very stable, without variations. Good news…
You need to login in order to vote
September 29, 2018 at 5:36 pm #910Today the memory seems very stable, without variations. Good news…
Good news for ASUS ;) if this same memory usage tomorrow, I will let ASUS know on Monday, hopefully this helps them with a good starting point for new firmware’s, if they do not know already regarding beta540
In a completely sane world, madness is the only freedom (J.G.Ballard).
You need to login in order to vote
September 30, 2018 at 5:41 pm #938– Revert to build 540 – WiFi 2.4GHz, 5GHz, Guest (no MAC Filter) – DDNS – DHCP da 192.168.1.50 a 192.168.1.199 – Port Forwarding (10 rules) – AI Protection off (default) – Firewall ON (after a switch to off and after a restore to on, otherwise I was not able to navigate on some sites, for example the Italian forum related the router).
Date Time Used % Free ---------------------------------- 2018-09-28 22:30 168MB (37%) 289MB 2018-09-29 07:20 170MB (37%) 288MB 2018-09-29 12:05 171MB (37%) 287MB 2018-09-29 15:30 171MB (37%) 287MB 2018-09-29 18:00 171MB (37%) 287MB 2018-09-29 20:30 171MB (37%) 287MB 2018-09-29 22:40 171MB (37%) 287MB 2018-09-30 09:00 171MB (37%) 286MB 2018-09-30 12:00 172MB (38%) 285MB 2018-09-30 14:00 173MB (38%) 284MB 2018-09-30 18:30 173MB (38%) 284MB
Hi @gigios, this is still showing no increase in memory usage by the DSL-AC88U running Beta 540 firmware. I think you have proved very well beta540 is a good point to allow ASUS to start new firmware development. I am happy for you to stop and will tell ASUS of your good work and results.
Thnk you for your kind help ;)
In a completely sane world, madness is the only freedom (J.G.Ballard).
You need to login in order to vote
September 30, 2018 at 5:45 pm #939October 1, 2018 at 2:39 pm #952On Italian Forum we have received this answer from ASUS:
“Thanks for confirmation. We also confirm that Build540 no such memory leak issue, so only several commits left to check, any update will inform you.”
Now I’m crossing my fingers for a solution.
You need to login in order to vote
October 1, 2018 at 3:51 pm #959October 1, 2018 at 5:07 pm #961October 2, 2018 at 10:40 am #976ASUS have given me a copy of there latest DSL-AC88U firmware with memory leak fix, see below and please be aware, this is a beta, so read ASUS DSL Beta Firmware Policy, top of ASUS Forum and I am happy to pass back comments to ASUS if this helps?
We have found root cause of memory leak issue, but not sure whether this is the only issue at the moment. This version is based on Build578 codebase, with Broadcom Patch5/ all WiFi patches adopted and with this memory leak issue fixed, should be optimal version currently. Feel free to share on your forums.
DSL-AC88U_v9.10.06_build585.zip
https://www.asuswebstorage.com/navigate/s/23991F8488394DAF92CBE25B97A5AB88Y
Alternate link is as follows.
https://www.asuswebstorage.com/navigate/s/8E6759046D13459BA0A9FCE3508A8DEC4Edit: DSL-AC3100_v9.10.06_build585.zip
https://www.asuswebstorage.com/navigate/s/9443A5F69A7A405AAFEF7993A892051BY
Factory reset Advised after flashing firmware
In a completely sane world, madness is the only freedom (J.G.Ballard).
You need to login in order to vote
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.